The two groups emphasized in their response that principal traders have a vested interest in
“Our members strongly believe that market integrity is not the exclusive responsibility of any one group of market providers or participants,” the groups said. “Rather, exchanges, clearing firms, trading firms, and regulators each have a role in ensuring fair and orderly markets. As noted in more detail in our response, proposed regulations and market structure reforms should carefully leverage the strengths of these constituencies.”
The two groups also urged IOSCO to recognize that technology has leveled the playing field for market participants and has provided a much higher degree of transparency for surveillance than historically available when the execution venue was a trading floor. The groups agreed that certain market structure refinements may be appropriate, but emphasized that the benefits of electronic
The response specifically addressed a number of questions posed in the IOSCO consultation report and commented on IOSCO’s analysis of several topics, including algorithmic trading, market fragmentation and dark liquidity, direct electronic access, co- location, tick sizes, fee structures, and
“One of the reasons we formed the FIA Principal Traders Group was to provide regulators with our perspective on the effects of technology on
“Academic and industry research overwhelmingly support the important role of electronic liquidity providers in today's marketplace including those who employ tools such as algorithmic and
The full text of the letter to IOSCO is available here.