file-o file-word file-excel file-powerpoint file-image file-archive file-audio file-movie file-code file-openoffice file-css menu googleplus facebook instagram twitter feed youtube vimeo2 lanyrd flickr picassa deviantart github wordpress blogger tumblr yahoo soundcloud skype linkedin lastfm delicious stumbleupon stackoverflow pinterest foursquare cross arrow-left arrow-down arrow-up arrow-right arrow-left2 arrow-down2 arrow-up2 arrow-right2 arrow-left3 arrow-down3 arrow-up3 arrow-right3 search

You are here

FIA statement on CFTC Customer Protection Rule

FIA statement on CFTC Customer Protection Rule

31 October 2013 9:15pm EDT

The Futures Industry Association today issued the following statement regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s final rule on customer protections: 

FIA strongly supports the vast majority of the customer protections contained in the rule, many of which grew out of recommendations made by an FIA task force in the wake of the MF Global collapse. The codification of these requirements strengthens the protections and safeguards for customers, and we commend the Commission for finalizing these important changes. 

However, we oppose the CFTC’s final language on residual interest for all the reasons that FIA, agricultural customers and Members of Congress have articulated to the Commission over the last several months of its consideration. Once it takes effect, this rule will require far-reaching changes to industry practices, and as has been recognized, this will most disadvantage agricultural customers and small futures commission merchants. Importantly this residual interest provision would not protect customers in an MF Global situation. 

We appreciate that in the final rule the Commission modified the residual interest requirement by phasing in the required changes over five years and by requiring a study and a roundtable to assess the impact of such changes. We are concerned, however, that it may prove difficult for any future Commission to adjust or revise this policy. The Commission’s residual interest requirements are based on an interpretation of FCM obligations that goes against decades of CFTC and industry practice. We disagree with this interpretation, and while we support studying the impact of the changes required by the new requirements, we want the study to be meaningful. 

For that reason, we welcome the comments made by several Commissioners at yesterday’s meeting that recognize the agency’s discretion and willingness to modify its policy on residual interest in response to the information it receives about the impact of these changes. Nonetheless, we think the better course would have been to adopt Commissioner O’Malia’s amendment, which would have achieved the Commission’s purpose without seeming to pre-determine the outcome. 

FIA looks forward to working with the Commission over the coming months to provide additional data and facts on the implications of yesterday’s decision. 

 

Close

Close

Menu

Menu

Back to FIA